A map(and a set) uses a binary tree structure internally, whereas an unordered_map(and an unordered_set) uses a hash table. set has a per item size of 32 + sizeof(V), while unordered_set has a per item size of 16 + sizeof(V). The mapped value can also be accessed directly by using member functions at or operator[]. An unordered_map is very much like a map. c++ - values - unordered_multimap vs unordered_map of vectors . Look those up on wikipedia or any computer science programming resource. But after some research I try to copy answer of this question C++ unordered_map fail when used with a vector as key. The time complexity to find an element in `std::vector` by linear search is O(N). When you need Low Memory: Unordered_map consumes extra memory for internal hashing, so if you are keeping millions and billions of data inside the map and want to consume less memory then choose std::map instead of std::unordered_map. Focus on problem 527E - Data Center Drama, it seems that it is good to use unordered_map instead of map. Stop timer. Another member function, unordered_map::count, can be used to just check whether a particular key exists. When you are interested in Ordering too R: Create empty vectors and add new items to it C++: Convert Array to Vector (7 Ways) Python: check if two lists are equal or not ( covers both Ordered & Unordered lists) For lists and vectors, time increased by the same order of magnitude, though it was 3 times faster with vectors. Also happens with std::vector in the same situation, not just unordered_map. The multimap in C++ seems to work really odd, i would like to know why Unordered_map of vectors. Example. c++ unordered_map of vectors. 1-unordered_map is more than 4 times faster. The hash key is an int for the type of the object, and the array is a list of the objects to render. Sort the container using list.sort for lists, and std::sort for vectors. Both map and unordered_map have similar memory usage as the corresponding set or unordered_set holding a pair
(that is, sizeof(K) + sizeof(V)), so there's no need to analyze them separately. unordered_multimap-iterating the result of find() yields elements with different value (3) . The difference is internal. Commenting out the unordered_map in the class allows intellisense to recognize the unordered_map in the struct (although I of course still need the unordered_map in the class for my code to function, so this doesn't really work as a solution.) Insert N integers in a container. c++ unordered_map of vectors, So conceptually I'm trying to create a hash of arrays of pointers to my object. It is O(log N) for `std::map` and O(1) for `std::unordered_map`. Start timer. std::vector v; // add some code here to fill v with some elements std::sort(v.begin(), v.end()); The header provides a number of useful functions for working with sorted vectors.. An important prerequisite for working with sorted vectors is that the stored values are comparable with <.. An unsorted vector can be sorted by using the function std::sort():. Searches the container for an element with k as key and returns an iterator to it if found, otherwise it returns an iterator to unordered_map::end (the element past the end of the container). Again, time increases by the same order of magnitude, but it is in average 5 times faster with vectors. My submission with map: 14269000 Time:484 MS. ... you will never check the same vectors with that trick! I'll not get into the details here, but I'll tell you this. Ask Question Asked 8 years, 6 months ago. However, the complexity notation ignores constant factors. Time complexity of find() in std::vector, std::map and std::unordered_map. When to choose map instead of unordered_map.